MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027787337 · doi:10.3402/ijch.v68i5.17381

The circumpolar inuit health summit: A summary

2009· article· en· W2027787337 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eva M. Krümmel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Circumpolar Health · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsInuit Circumpolar Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCircumpolar starSummitArcticGeographyThe arcticEthnologyOceanographyPhysical geographyHistoryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Inuit (often referred to as ‘Eskimos’) are Arctic peoples living in 4 countries of the circumpolar region: the Alaska (USA), Canada, Greenland and Chukotka (Russia). In June of 1977, Mayor Eben Hopson of the North Slope Borough, Alaska, hosted the first ever Inuit Circumpolar Conference. Since then, the Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC) has grown into a major international non-governmental organization representing approximately 155,000 Inuit of Alaska (USA), Canada, Greenland and Chukotka (Russia). ICC has offices in each of the four countries and works on issues affecting circumpolar Inuit, such as environment, human rights and health (1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.378 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Circumpolar HealthSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207