MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027795136 · doi:10.5944/etfiii.27.2014.12642

Paleografía Latina: recursos para docentes y estudiantes o sobre cómo no perderse en la Red

2014· article· es· W2027795136 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEspacio Tiempo y Forma Serie III Historia Medieval · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeography and Education Methods
Canadian institutionsPontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSubject matterCartographySociologyGeographyPedagogyCurriculum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo se recomiendan páginas web de utilidad para la docencia de las asignaturas comprendidas dentro del área de las Ciencias y Técnicas Historiográficas, en especial para Paleografía. La intención es que cada profesor conozca los recursos disponibles online en relación con esta materia para que pueda servirse de ellos a la hora de complementar su Plan Docente acorde con las nuevas exigencias de la «Era Digital». Del mismo modo, se pretende también proporcionar al alumno recursos útiles para optimizar su metodología de estudio de Paleografía.In this article, I recommend useful websites for teaching the subjects covered within the area of Manuscript Studies, especially for Palaeography. My main purpose is to ensure that every teacher is familiar with the online resources available on this subject and is able to use them to complement her or his Teaching Plan with the new requirements of the «Digital Age.» Similarly, I also aim to provide students with useful resources to optimize their methodology for studying Palaeography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it