MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027846434 · doi:10.1109/tip.2013.2291329

Comment on “Collinear Segment Detection Using HT Neighborhoods”

2013· letter· en· W2027846434 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2013
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Object Detection Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHough transformIntersection (aeronautics)Complement (music)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)Image segmentationSpace (punctuation)AlgorithmGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel application of the Hough transform (HT) neighborhood approach to collinear segment detection was proposed in [1]. It, however, suffered from one major weakness in that it could not provide an effective solution to the case of segment intersection. This paper analyzes a vital prerequisite step, disturbance elimination in the Hough space, and shows why, this method alone, is incapable of distinguishing the true segment endpoints. To address the problem, a unique HT butterfly separation method is proposed in this correspondence, as an essential complement to the above publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it