Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans La condition urbaine , Olivier Mongin soutenait que « le premier langage qui permet de qualifier l’expérience urbaine est […] celui du poète et de l’écrivain, celui des mots et de leur rythmique. » (Mongin 2005 : 32). Mongin posait alors la question de l’implication du corps dans l’expérience de l’espace urbain traduite dans le texte. En littérature acadienne, il est difficile de songer à un exemple plus pertinent pour illustrer ces propos que celui de l’oeuvre de Gérald Leblanc. Dans un contexte de francophonie minoritaire, où l’espace demeure investi d’un récit de dépossession, Leblanc aura choisi de canaliser l’identité collective dans les possibles de l’expérience urbaine individuelle. Empirique, adoptant l’esprit jubilatoire que lui inspire l’espace monctonien pour libérer son identité acadienne de ses faux récits contraignants et restrictifs, le poète propose une « infinité de parcours » individuels (Mongin 2005 : 39-40) pour signifier l’appartenance collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".