Locally Aromatic Polycyclic Hydrocarbons as Potential Carriers of Infrared Emission Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report B-LYP/6-31G* and B3-LYP/6-31G* density functional theory calculations on a set of polycyclic hydrocarbons, ranging in size from C19H22 to C36H32, combining aromatic (unsaturated) and aliphatic (saturated, sp3-hybridized carbon) ring systems. These locally aromatic polycyclic hydrocarbons (LAPHs), generally exhibiting large deviations from planarity, may be considered as intermediate structures between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and nanodiamonds. Calculated infrared vibrational frequencies are found to be similar to those observed experimentally in spectra of hydrogenated amorphous carbon (HAC) and other carbonaceous solids. In the C-H stretching region (∼3.1-3.6 μm) these species are characterized by strong absorption/emission within both the aliphatic and aromatic C-H bands. They also show spectral features associated with tertiary C-H. Similar features are evident in calculated spectra of the corresponding ions, which we have characterized in some cases. Ionization results in the particular enhancement of a spectral feature typically seen at ∼6.4 μm, in the aromatic C-C stretching region. In keeping with previous experimental and theoretical studies on the spectra of neutral and cationic PAHs, we find that the influence of ionization on the relative intensities of C-C and C-H stretching features is much greater than the influence of molecular structure. We suggest that LAPHs may be significant contributors to emission in Type B unidentified infrared emission sources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".