MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027875760 · doi:10.2216/06-33.1

Relative contribution of vegetative propagation and sexual reproduction in the maintenance of Acrosiphonia (Chlorophyta) populations

2007· article· en· W2027875760 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Andrea V. Sussmann, Robert E. DeWreede

Bibliographic record

VenuePhycologia · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyChlorophytaSexual reproductionReproductionVegetative reproductionBotanyEcologyAlgae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We provide evidence for new vegetative growth in spring from overwintering basal remnants of the green alga Acrosiphonia (Codiolales sensu van den Hoek et al. 1995) long after mortality of the filamentous thalli at two independent study sites in Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada. The two study sites differed in Acrosiphonia species composition, abundance and seasonality, but were both characterised by disturbance. At Prasiola Point we estimated approximately 15–30% Acrosiphonia recruitment to originate from vegetative regrowth (based on mapping individual thalli). At Seppings Island significantly lower Acrosiphonia recruitment on cleared boulders than uncleared boulders provided an estimate of approximately 50% recruitment from vegetative regrowth. These results increase our understanding of the complex life history of Acrosiphonia in southwestern British Columbia by detecting the role of vegetative propagation in the maintenance of sexually reproducing populations. The previously undocumen...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhycologiaSame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207