MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

De teules al regreso del Señor desterrado: la imaginación política de las élites mesoamericanas

2008· article· es· W2027883002 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin Hispanique · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine la récente hypothèse selon laquelle la perception par les Mésoaméricains de Cortés et de ses hommes comme étant des teules, ou des dieux, ne serait qu’une construction post-conquête élaborée par les descendants des Aztèques, sous l’influence des Franciscains et de la Deuxième lettre de Cortés. Je suggère plutôt que si effectivement l’histoire a été retouchée et améliorée après la chute de Tenochtitlán, il y a trop de témoignages contradictoires qui font qu’on ne peut écarter que les Mésoaméricains aient vu les Européens comme des teules. Je soutiens aussi que la protothèse à l’origine du mythe du retour de Quetzalcóatl ne devrait pas être attribuée à Cortés, mais plutôt aux besoins politiques des élites mésoaméricaines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it