MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027884629 · doi:10.1159/000242572

Indomethacin Metabolism in Liver Microsomes during Postnatal Development in the Rat

2009· article· en· W2027884629 on OpenAlexaff
Martine Clozel, Kae Beharry, Jacob V. Aranda

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhenobarbitalMetabolismEndocrinologyInternal medicineMicrosomeMonooxygenaseEnzymeChemistryDrug metabolismCytochrome P450BiologyBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indomethacin is now widely used during the neonatal period, but few data exist concerning its metabolism during this period. Thus, we studied the maturational changes in the metabolism of indomethacin into desmethylindomethacin by isolated liver microsomes from 1- to 60-day-old rats. From 8 days of age on, there was a progressive increase in enzymatic activity which was inversely correlated with the change in Michaelis-Menten constant. However, the maximal velocity was not significantly affected by the age. These findings suggest that the deficient metabolism of indomethacin in the newborn rat is due to decreased affinity between enzyme and substrate, or presence of competitive inhibitors. To determine the substrate specificity of the monooxygenase-catalyzing inducers, sodium phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone given during 3 days in neonatal rats were also studied. Although beta-naphthoflavone did not exhibit any significant effect, phenobarbital significantly increased the activity and maximal velocity of indomethacin O-demethylation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicPharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismFrench-language works237,207