MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2027926916 · doi:10.1007/s12549-010-0040-2

Evolution of anuran assemblages in the Late Cretaceous of Utah, USA

2010· article· en· W2027926916 on OpenAlexaff
Zbyněk Roček, Jeffrey G. Eaton, James D. Gardner, Tomáš Přikryl

Bibliographic record

VenuePalaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmphibian and Reptile Biology
Canadian institutionsRoyal Tyrrell Museum
FundersNational Park ServiceMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovyAmerican Chemical Society Petroleum Research FundMuseum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard UniversityHarvard UniversityNational Geographic SocietyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCretaceousCenomanianPaleontologyOsteologyGeologyDorsumYixian FormationBiologyZoologyMesozoicAnatomyStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several hundred isolated anuran bones recovered from 37 localities in southern Utah, USA, provide a relatively continuous record of the evolution of anuran assemblages in the central part of the North American Western Interior that spans almost 25 million years, from the early Cenomanian to the late Campanian. Although it is difficult to associate isolated anuran bones from different parts of the skeleton with each other, it is possible to identify distinctive morphs for certain bones (e.g., ilia, maxillae) that can be used to make inferences about the taxonomic diversity of fossil assemblages. Because the samples document a relatively long interval of time, they can also be used to recognize trends in the anatomical evolution of anurans and in the evolution of anuran assemblages. Small-bodied anurans prevailed until the early Campanian, then beginning in the late Campanian, larger-bodied anurans began dominating assemblages. Using iliac morphs as a proxy for taxonomic diversity, it is apparent that some local assemblages were surprisingly diverse. When coupled with previously reported fossils, the new specimens from Utah help document when certain anatomical features appeared and radiated among anurans. Ilia in the majority of early anurans (including the earliest anuran Prosalirus) had an oblique groove on the dorsal margin but lacked a dorsal tubercle. Through the Late Cretaceous, there is a trend towards an increasing majority of ilia having a well-developed dorsal tubercle; this osteological change could be associated with changes in locomotor behavior. Procoelous vertebrae are already present in the Cenomanian samples, which indicates that this derived anuran vertebral condition must have appeared before the Late Cretaceous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalaeobiodiversity and PalaeoenvironmentsSame topicAmphibian and Reptile BiologyFrench-language works237,207