MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Family Affinity of the Genus <I>Palaeopsychops</I> Andersen with Description of a New Species from the Early Eocene of British Columbia, Canada (Neuroptera: Polystoechotidae)

2003· article· en· W2027932366 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Vladimir N. Makarkin, S. Bruce Archibald

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSimon Fraser UniversityChongqing University of Arts and Sciences
KeywordsNomen nudumBiologyNeuropteraGenusSynonym (taxonomy)ZoologyBotanyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Palaeopsychops dodgeorum sp. n. from the Early Eocene Okanagan Highlands of Quilchena, British Columbia, Canada is described. The systematic position of the genus PalaeopsychopsAndersen, 2001 is discussed, interpreting this as most closely associated with Polystoechotidae. Osmylites protogaea (Hagen 1862) is considered as nomen nudum and an objective synonym of Osmylites excelsa (Oppenheim, 1888), syn. n.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.645
Threshold uncertainty score0.705

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the Entomological Society of AmericaSame topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207