Coupling-in-the-continuum effects in Coulomb dissociation of halo nuclei
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Higher-order effects in the Coulomb dissociation of halo nuclei are investigated by comparing the first-order perturbation theory to the numerical resolution of a time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation. The calculations are performed for the breakup on a lead target of $^{11}\mathrm{Be}$ and $^{8}\mathrm{B}$. The populations of the different partial waves composing the $^{10}\mathrm{Be}$-neutron or $^{7}\mathrm{Be}$-proton continuum reveal that couplings in the continuum remain significant even at high impact parameters and high projectile-target relative velocities. Although the total breakup cross section is fairly well described by a first-order approximation, its partial-wave components reached by the first-order transitions are significantly depleted toward other partial waves after the closest approach. The information extracted by assuming the validity of the first-order approximation is affected by an energy distortion. Another distortion is caused by the presence of a resonance as exemplified by the $5/{2}^{+}$ resonance of $^{11}\mathrm{Be}$. Such effects may partly explain discrepancies between direct and indirect measurements of the astrophysical S factor of the $^{7}\mathrm{Be}(\text{p},\ensuremath{\gamma})^{8}\mathrm{B}$ reaction at stellar energies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".