MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028001972 · doi:10.1002/met.14

The influence of an upper‐level frontal zone on the Mack Lake Wildfire environment

2007· article· en· W2028001972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMeteorological Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Forest ServiceUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsTroposphereClimatologyRidgeFront (military)GeologyJet streamEnvironmental scienceCold frontSynoptic scale meteorologySubsidenceIntrusionTrough (economics)Air mass (solar energy)Atmospheric sciencesJet (fluid)Structural basinOceanographyBoundary layerGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Meteorological assessment of wildland fire danger has traditionally involved the identification of several synoptic weather types empirically determined to influence wildfire spread. Specifically, in the Great Lakes Region, high wildfire danger is often witnessed in association with northwesterly synoptic‐scale flow aloft. Such synoptic‐scale flow is regularly associated with the development of upper‐level frontal zones also known as upper‐level jet/front systems, which are often characterised by intrusions of stratospheric air into the troposphere. The notion that upper‐frontal development can play an important role in promoting wildfire spread is advanced through interrogation of the output from a fine‐scale numerical simulation of a documented explosive wildfire case; the Mack Lake Fire of May 1980. The Mack Lake case was characterised by a developing upper‐level front embedded within a shortwave trough in the vicinity of the fire location. The upper‐level front originated in northwesterly flow in central Canada as an upper‐tropospheric ridge amplified over western North America. A thermally indirect circulation at the jet exit region both contributed to the intensification of the front and was associated with a maximum in quasi‐geostrophic descent at mid‐levels upstream of the fire region. The subsidence ushered dry air from the middle and upper‐troposphere downward along sloping isentropes adiabatically warming and drying it along the way. A well‐developed dry air intrusion associated with the operation of these processes extended to nearly the 750 hPa level far downstream from the actual upper‐frontal zone supplying the fire environment with dry air that originated in the upper‐troposphere/lower stratosphere. The organised subsidence was also responsible for downward advection of high momentum air from within the frontal zone into the fire environment, further influencing the wildfire spread. We conclude that upper‐frontal processes, characteristic of northwesterly synoptic‐scale flow, are likely a contributing factor to the prevalence of wildfire spread under such synoptic‐scale conditions. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it