MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028006917 · doi:10.2495/sdp-v2-n2-153-166

Multifunctional landscapes for urban flood control in developing countries

2007· article· en· W2028006917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and Rural Development Challenges
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrbanizationFlood controlEnvironmental planningUrban planningWater qualityWatershedTributaryWater resource managementSewerageFlood mythCivil engineeringEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The urbanisation process changes the natural landscape, generally aggravating flood problems. In developing countries, urbanisation is not always accomplished by the implementation of the adequate infrastructure required. Lack of planning frequently worsens this situation. Focus on urban flood problems has been changing in the last few decades. The traditional approach that basically worked on the drainage net, by canalising and rectifying water courses, is being complemented or substituted by different concepts. One new approach tries to achieve a systemic solution for the basin, with distributed interventions aiming to recover pre-urbanisation flow patterns and combining water quality and quantity control aspects. These modern concepts deal with techniques known as 'best management practices'. In densely urbanised environments, however, it is not always easy to find suitable areas available for construction of detention reservoirs or extensive infiltration measures, for instance. In such a situation, an interesting option may be the use of multifunctional landscapes, in which urban solutions gain additional hydraulic functions, combining urban planning and hydraulic engineering aspects to revitalise urban environments in a sustainable manner. The use of existing parks and squares, remodelled to aggregate permanent or temporary ponds, can be an interesting option for flood control. In developing countries, however, as in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, water quality problems due to untreated sewage disposal are generally more crucial than those associated with watershed washoff. This article presents a case study related to the urban basin of the Joana River, which is one of the major tributaries of the drainage net of the centre-north zone of Rio de Janeiro city, which contains traditional town districts. The article presents a comparison, in terms of flood levels, between scenarios that consider the present situation and a combination of traditional and alternative flood control measures. This assessment was carried out using a mathematical cell model and the results presented show the potential benefits that can be achieved through the use of multifunctional landscapes with flood control features. This type of solution points to the combining of architecture, urbanism and engineering to help in solving flood control problems in urban environments, especially those that are a reality in developing countries. Finally, the City Hall intervention, which was developed based on the ideas proposed in this article, is presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it