Bibliographic record
Abstract
La création du parc national des Monts-Torngat en 2005 et du parc national Kuururjuaq en 2009 a, en quelque sorte, conduit à la formation d’une aire protégée transfrontalière (APT) sur une grande partie de la péninsule du Labrador dans le Nord-Est canadien. Selon l’Union internationale pour la conservation de la nature (2000), les aires protégées transfrontalières sont des espaces composés de deux ou plusieurs aires protégées situées sur ou près de frontières territoriales. Les juridictions compétentes sont les instances nationales ou infranationales des territoires sur lesquels sont implantées les aires protégées (Borrini-Feyerabend et al., 2009). Cet article propose une description de cette aire protégée transfrontalière. Il met plus particulièrement l’accent sur la protection du patrimoine naturel et culturel, sur la participation inuite à la gouvernance, et s’intéresse aux retombées économiques, notamment à travers le développement des activités touristiques que les Inuits pourront obtenir de cette aire protégée transfrontalière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".