La construction d'un système socio-technique. Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La construction d'un système socio-technique Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques Dans cet article, nous nous proposons de traiter des relations entre les systèmes techniques et tout ce qui est généralement entendu sous le vocable de " contexte " ou d'" environnement ". Nous partirons d'un projet d'innovation - la conception, au Nicaragua, d'un système technique permettant de fabriquer des briquettes, destinées à la combustion, à partir des tiges de cotonnier - en montrant comment chaque choix technique se trouve au nœud entre des contraintes et des problèmes de nature très diverse. Mais, nous intéressant plus spécifiquement à la manière dont les objets techniques participent à la construction de notre culture, entendue au sens large du terme, nous essayerons de prolonger ce travail en direction de ce que l'on pourrait appeler une anthropologie des techniques. Plus que de suivre strictement l'élaboration d'un système technique, il s'agira de montrer la genèse simultanée de l'objet et de son environnement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.050 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".