MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028031071 · doi:10.1152/ajplung.00042.2002

Effect of cigarette smoke on fibroblast-mediated gel contraction is dependent on cell density

2003· article· en· W2028031071 on OpenAlexaff
Hangjun Wang, Xiangde Liu, Takeshi Umino, Tadashi Kohyama, Yun Zhu, Fuqiang Wen, John R. Spurzem, Debra J. Romberger, Hui Jung Kim, Stephen I. Rennard

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibronectinFibroblastContraction (grammar)ChemistryTransforming growth factorCigarette smokeCell growthMessenger RNACell cultureCellMolecular biologyCell biologyIn vitroEndocrinologyBiologyBiochemistryGeneToxicologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cigarette smoke exposure has been associated with a variety of diseases, including emphysema. The current study evaluated the interaction of cell density and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) on fibroblast contraction of collagen gels. Protein levels of transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1, fibronectin, PGE(2), and TGF-beta1 mRNA were quantified. Although both 5 and 10% CSE inhibited contraction by low-density fibroblasts (1 x 10(5) cell/ml), only 5% CSE augmented contraction in higher-density cultures (3-5 x 10(5) cells/ml). CSE also inhibited fibronectin and TGF-beta1 production in low-density cultures but stimulated fibronectin production in high-density cultures. Active TGF-beta1 was readily detectable only in higher-density cultures and was markedly augmented by 5% CSE. In contrast, although TGF-beta1 mRNA expression was inhibited in high-density cultures by 10% CSE, expression was increased in the presence of 5% CSE. These results suggest that CSE-induced inhibition of low-density fibroblast contraction is due to inhibition of fibronectin production, whereas CSE's stimulatory effect on high-density cells is the result of increased release of TGF-beta1. These effects may help explain the varied pathologies associated with exposure to cigarette smoke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Lung Cellular and Molecular PhysiologySame topicOccupational and environmental lung diseasesFrench-language works237,207