MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028055907 · doi:10.1139/h2001-054

The Adverse Effects of Elite Competition on Health and Well-Being

2001· review· en· W2028055907 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersDirectorate for Computer and Information Science and Engineering
KeywordsEliteCompetition (biology)AthletesVariety (cybernetics)Elite athletesPublic relationsSports medicinePolitical sciencePsychologyMedicinePhysical therapyLawBiologyPoliticsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is often assumed that participation in sport will produce only an array of health benefits. The adverse consequences of sport participation, particularly at the elite level, are rarely explored. Evidence continues to accumulate of a variety of unfortunate consequences that may accompany elite sport participation. Sport involvement may exacerbate pre-existing health problems, cause injury or even death. The sport environment may be hazardous in a variety of physical, emotional, and social ways. The common training and competition practices of certain sport cultures may themselves be harmful. Athletes may sacrifice health, home, education and normal social development in the pursuit of sport "success." Sport medicine professionals and sport scientists have particular opportunities and responsibilities to act as an athlete's advocate--and to protect their health and well being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it