Coding Joint Diversity in Mature and Immature B‐Cell Lines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antigen receptor gene rearrangement is regulated by many factors in B and T lymphocytes. The sequences of the gene segments themselves, their associated recombination signal sequences (RSS), expression of the RAG genes and the chromatin accessibility of the particular gene segments to be rearranged all influence the outcome of recombination and thus antigen receptor diversity. In the present study, we have evaluated the effect of variations in RAG activity level on the junctional diversity of coding joint sequences. Using the pre-B-like 204-1-8 and the mature B DR3 cell lines under different transfection conditions, we were able to investigate recombination activity levels that varied 100-fold. We evaluated the sequences of the coding joints for junctional diversity resulting from nucleotide addition or deletion. Surprisingly, we found that the sequence of coding joints of these recombinants did not exhibit significant variation despite the large difference in recombination frequency. Our results indicate that the fidelity of the joining phase of V(D)J recombination is not jeopardized by varying RAG activity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".