MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028103586 · doi:10.1021/ef0500484

Fluid Properties of Asphaltenes at 310−530 °C

2005· article· en· W2028103586 on OpenAlexaff
Oswaldo J. Asprino, Janet A.W. Elliott, William C. McCaffrey, Murray R. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneCokeSurface tensionCrackingViscosityChemistryHeptaneResidue (chemistry)Chemical engineeringAtmospheric temperature rangeOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The viscosity and surface tension of n -heptane-insoluble asphaltenes and asphaltene−vacuum residue blends were determined by measuring the forces on liquid bridges between thin films. Asphaltenes from a variety of heavy oils and bitumens gave surface tensions in the range of 15−19 mN/m at 358 °C and viscosities of 9−16 Pa s. At temperatures above ca. 400 °C, the viscosity increased to as much as 70 Pa s because of cracking and coke formation, whereas the surface tension declined to values as low as 5 mN/m. The properties of vacuum residues and blends of residue and asphaltenes all approached the properties of the asphaltenes at high temperature, because of extensive cracking and devolatilization. The contact angles of the asphaltene melts were in the range of 18°−57° on Ni/Fe and coke surfaces. The differences in fluid properties between asphaltenes did not correlate with the average chemical characteristics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207