MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Measured performance of hybrid small-gap in-vacuum undulator 08ID-1 at the CLS intermediate energy storage ring

2013· article· en· W2028138328 on OpenAlexafffundabout
James Gorin, I. Blomqvist, Michael Sigrist, T. Summers, Michel Fodje, Paweł Grochulski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanCanadian Light Source (Canada)
FundersWestern Economic Diversification CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsUndulatorStorage ringBeamlineOpticsMagnetPhysicsSynchrotron radiationHarmonicsMaterials scienceRadiationVoltageBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent development of undulator in-vacuum technology has allowed intermediate energy storage rings, such the Canadian Light Source (CLS), to build high brilliance protein crystallography beamlines. The Canadian Macromolecular Crystallography Facility (CMCF) beamline 08ID-1 is the first small period (20 mm) hybrid small-gap in-vacuum undulator (SGU) to be employed at the CLS as a source of high harmonic, high brightness radiation (6.5 – 18 keV). The SGU was assembled and shimmed at the CLS Magnetic Mapping Facility. It is installed in the upstream part of straight section 8 of the CLS ring and chicaned inboard by 0.75 mrad. The downstream half of this section is reserved for future development. To achieve a maximum undulator field (B0) in conjunction with low sensitivity to radiation damage, a hybrid layout for the undulator is used with Sm2Co17 permanent magnets sandwiched between Vanadium Permendur ferromagnetic poles. To date, operations in the 6.5 – 18 keV energy range have been achieved using the 3rd to 9th harmonics, with gap sizes of 5.9 – 8.6 mm. Gaps smaller than 5.9 mm are not being used since in the 5.0 – 5.9 mm range the rms phase errors are larger than 2.5° and lower harmonics at larger gaps are being used instead. The goal of the present study is to measure the output spectrum for various gap sizes and compare these with theoretical expectations calculated from the magnetic characteristics of the undulator measured at the CLS Magnetic Mapping Facility. The 08ID-1 beamline now has several years of successful operation as a highly competitive, high brilliance beamline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207