MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028200472 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0391

Dust acoustic shock waves in arbitrarily charged dusty plasma with low and high temperature non-thermal ions

2015· article· en· W2028200472 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Apul N. Dev, Jnanjyoti Sarma, Manoj Kr. Deka

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDust and Plasma Wave Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsShock waveAmplitudeDusty plasmaIonPlasmaBurgers' equationElectronNonlinear systemShock waves in astrophysicsAtomic physicsPerturbation (astronomy)Classical mechanicsMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using the well-known reductive perturbation technique, the three-dimensional (3D) Burgers equation and modified 3D Burgers equation have been derived for a plasma system comprising of non-thermal ions, Maxwellian electrons, and negatively charged fluctuating dust particles. The salient features of nonlinear propagation of shock waves in such plasmas have been investigated in detail. The different temperature non-thermal ions and Maxwellian electrons are found to play an important role in the shock waves solution. The analytical solution of the 3D Burgers equation and modified 3D Burgers equation ratifying the propagation of dust acoustic shock waves are derived using the well-known tanh method. On increasing the population of non-thermal ions, an enhancement in the amplitude of shock waves is seen for negatively charged dust particles. A striking dependence of amplitude and width of shock waves on the ratio of ion temperatures and densities are also reported. Finally we introduced a new stretching coordinate and perturbation for the nth-order nonlinear 3D Burgers equation and its solution by the use of the tanh method. We found that, due to higher nonlinearity, the amplitude of shock waves decreases while width remains constant for all plasma parameters considered in the present investigation. The features accounted here could be relevant in the case of different space and astrophysical plasmas and laboratory dusty plasma for negatively charged dust fluctuation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicDust and Plasma Wave PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207