Fast multichannel switching for IEEE 802.11s multiradio wireless mesh networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless mesh networks (WMN) are efficient and low cost solutions for the deployment of broadband access in various environments. To support real-time applications such as multimedia and emergency services, WMNs must provide quality of service (QoS) guarantees and QoS continuity protection. While the capacity of single radio WMNs may severely limit the QoS for such traffic, multiradio WMNs can overcome this restriction and provide additional links to support better QoS mechanisms. This paper describes the design and implementation of a mechanism to switch channel in IEEE 802.11s multiradio WMNs. This semi-centralized mechanism decreases the delays required to switch channels and ensures a continuous connectivity between mesh points and mesh portal points. Intended for self-configuration and self-healing mechanisms, the performance of our new channel switch mechanism is evaluated in a simulated environment. We show that time performance results obtained to optimize topologies or to recover from failures are well below the time constraints of real-time applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".