MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028241704 · doi:10.13031/2013.23532

Mathematical Modeling of Airflow Distribution in Grain Bulks - a Review

2007· review· en· W2028241704 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G. James Pitchai, Digvir S. Jayas

Bibliographic record

Venue2007 Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 17-20, 2007 · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Surface Properties and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsAirflowAerationDistribution (mathematics)Field (mathematics)Computer scienceStrengths and weaknessesMathematical modelIndustrial engineeringMechanical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uniformity of airflow distribution plays an important role during drying and aeration. Good understanding of airflow process in grain bulk helps design-engineers, farmers or grain store managers to make appropriate decisions for preserving grain quality. Mathematical description of movement of air inside the grain mass is a cost-effective method of studying airflow distribution in grain bulks by reducing the number of field trials and labor requirements. This paper presents an overview of reported mathematical models, comparing and contrasting their strengths and weaknesses. The applications of these mathematical models and the expected advancements in this field are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2007 Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 17-20, 2007Same topicPlant Surface Properties and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207