MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028256989 · doi:10.3390/d4010161

Correction: Tedder, A. et al. Using chloroplast trnF pseudogenes for phylogeography in Arabidopsis lyrata. Diversity 2010, 2, 653-678

2012· article· en· W2028256989 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Andrew Tedder, Peter N. Hoebe, Yvonne Willi, Stephen W. Ansell, Barbara K. Mable

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Diversity and Evolution
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Park ServiceNatural Environment Research CouncilSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungETH Zürich FoundationUniversity of GlasgowParks CanadaIllinois Department of Natural ResourcesNature ConservancyMichigan Department of Natural Resources
KeywordsAcknowledgementPseudogeneTable (database)Diversity (politics)BiologyLibrary scienceComputer scienceComputational biologyGeneticsSociologyAnthropologyGenomeData miningGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the original version of our article [1], insufficient acknowledgement was given for the source of some of the DNA samples used. We apologize for the original error. To correct this oversight, Yvonne Willi has been added as an author, a recent paper by Willi, Y. et al. (2010) has been added, the acknowledgements have been altered to more appropriately recognize support and funding, and the sources of samples collected have been corrected in Table 1. [...]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversitySame topicPlant Diversity and EvolutionFrench-language works237,207