RELAÇÃO ENTRE QUALIDADE DE VIDA E ATIVIDADE FÍSICA: UMA REVISÃO SISTEMÁTICA DA LITERATURA NACIONAL
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is possible that physical activity practice affects the quality of life of any subject, independently of age, sex and ethnicity. Therefore, this issue has received increasing attention. The aim of this study was to analyze through systematic review, national data about the relationship between physical activity and quality of life, as well as, to indicate future lines of research. It was carried out a systematic review in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO). Only Brazilian original articles were taken into count. Statistical analysis was composed by signal test and Fisher's exact test, being significance set at p<5%. In all analyzed studies (n=6; 100%), sample size ranged from 30 to 863 subjects. Higher number of articles was published in last two years, and many analyses involved elderly (66.7%; p=0.404). Quality of life was measured by two questionnaires: SF-36 and World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL). There was less articles analyzing men, comparing with women. In all analyzed articles, physical activity was positively related to better quality of life, independently of age. In summary, quality of life seems positively related to higher physical activity independently of age, however, more studies are necessary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it