MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028301746 · doi:10.1086/501041

Correlation between Nuclear Spin Ratio of Cyclic C<sub>3</sub>H<sub>2</sub>and Chemical Evolution in TMC‐1 Cores

2006· article· en· W2028301746 on OpenAlexaff
Yusuke Morisawa, Mizuho Fushitani, Yoshiyasu Kato, Hiromichi Hoshina, Zenzo Simizu, Shiori Watanabe, Yuki Miyamoto, Yasuko Kasai, Kentarou Kawaguchi, Takamasa Momose

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSpin (aerodynamics)Nuclear reactionNuclear physicsAstrophysicsAtomic physicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ortho-to-para nuclear spin ratio of cyclopropenylidene (cyclic C3H2) in TMC-1 cores was investigated using the 45 m radio telescope at Nobeyama Radio Observatory. We have observed four ortho lines (J = 212-101, 312-303, 321-312, and 330-321) and four para lines (J = 202-111, 211-202, 220-211, and 322-313) of cyclic C3H2 in six cores in TMC-1. A statistical equilibrium analysis of the observed intensities revealed apparent correlation between the ortho-to-para ratio of cyclic C3H2 and chemical evolution of the molecular cloud; the ortho-to-para ratio in younger cores is less than 2, while that in older cores is close to the statistical ratio of 3. A simple chemical model calculation indicates that the correlation is ascribed to the conservation of nuclear spin angular momenta in chemical reactions relevant to the production, destruction, and reproduction of cyclic C3H2. Since cyclic C3H2 has been observed in a variety of sources, the ortho-to-para ratio of cyclic C3H2 may be a useful probe of chemical evolution of molecular clouds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.328
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207