MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028331280 · doi:10.4000/pistes.3323

La baisse de la polyvalence avec l’âge : question de vieillissement, d’expérience, de génération ?

2003· article· fr· W2028331280 on OpenAlex
Corinne Gaudart

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La diminution de la polyvalence avec l’âge est une tendance observée depuis plusieurs années dans les enquêtes statistiques françaises. Les explications les plus fréquemment avancées font référence à une baisse de la motivation avec l’âge et à des difficultés à s’adapter aux changements. Toutefois, les études ergonomiques, ici dans le secteur industriel, montrent que les registres d’explications à l’œuvre sont multiples. Ils concernent la possibilité de transférer son expérience qui, avec l’âge, intègre des stratégies de préservation de soi ; cette expérience se construit individuellement et collectivement selon les situations. Ils concernent également les conditions organisationnelles de l’apprentissage et de la formation. Par ailleurs le seuil critique au-delà duquel la polyvalence diminuerait est variable suivant les âges des collectifs, et il s’inscrit dans le temps des générations et de l’histoire des organisations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it