MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028336078 · doi:10.1103/physreve.83.026310

Determination of the effective gas diffusivity of a porous composite medium from the three-dimensional reconstruction of its microstructure

2011· article· en· W2028336078 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTortuosityThermal diffusivityKnudsen numberMaterials sciencePorosityPorous mediumMonte Carlo methodDiffusionKnudsen diffusionMicrostructureWork (physics)Mass diffusivityMechanicsMean squared displacementStatistical physicsGeometryThermodynamicsMathematicsPhysicsComposite materialStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work describes a procedure to calculate the effective diffusivity of a porous composite medium from the three-dimensional reconstruction of its microstructure. We perform Monte Carlo simulations based on the mean-square displacement method on numerical models of composite materials microstructures. First, computations of the effective diffusivity in the bulk diffusion regime account for the effect of the tortuosity of the geometry on gas diffusion. The Bruggeman equation, which is often used in the literature to relate the effective diffusivity to the porosity of the structure, appears to be inaccurate for porosities ε<0.40. A more accurate correlation for this range of porosities is provided based on the results of our simulations. Second, the Bosanquet equation, which accounts for the effect of pore confinement on gas diffusion, is validated provided that the definition of the Knudsen number is based on the appropriate characteristic length. The procedure to calculate this characteristic length is demonstrated for analytical geometries. However, in practice, geometries obtained from experimental measurements are discrete. For discrete geometries, we show the effect of the resolution of the geometry on the accuracy of the calculation of the effective diffusivity and other properties of the porous material. In addition, the tesselation of solid surfaces affects the calculation of the chord-length distribution regardless of the resolution. This hinders the accurate estimation of the characteristic length necessary to compute the Knudsen number and the effective diffusivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.655
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it