MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028336387 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-992932

In Vitro Maturation for Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

2008· review· en· W2028336387 on OpenAlexaff
Shauna Reinblatt, William Buckett

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Reproductive Medicine · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian function and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycystic ovaryOvarian hyperstimulation syndromeIn vitro fertilisationIn vitro maturationGynecologyEmbryo transferOvaryBiologyLive birthInfertilityPregnancyAndrologyAssisted reproductive technologyMedicineOocyteEmbryoEndocrinologyObesity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In vitro fertilization (IVF) with ovarian stimulation is an effective treatment for couples needing treatment with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) where polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is coexisting. However, it is also associated with an increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In vitro maturation (IVM) avoids the risks and side effects of ovarian stimulation by retrieving immature oocytes from unstimulated ovaries. These immature oocytes are then cultured, matured, and fertilized in vitro. Embryos are then selected for transfer in the same manner as conventional IVF. Although there has been significant progress in terms of improving clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates after IVM, there remains much to learn in terms of what controls maturation, fertilization, and implantation rates. This review is intended as an update on the most recent advances and directions of ongoing research in IVM in patients with PCOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in Reproductive MedicineSame topicOvarian function and disordersFrench-language works237,207