Understanding reversed temperature dependence of diffusional solidification time in single crystal superalloy brazement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A fully implicit two-dimensional moving-mesh finite element simulation model, without symmetry assumption, recently developed by the present authors was used to study the cause of anomalous reversed temperature dependence of diffusional solidification completion time, t f, during brazing of single crystal nickel-based superalloys. Contrary to the general concept of competition between solute diffusivity and solubility, as predicted by analytical models, numerical calculations coupled with experimental observation showed that the anomalous behavior is caused by departure from parabolic liquid–solid interface migration with time. Application of the new numerical model coupled with the understanding provided by the study resulted in a viable approach for minimizing the time required to produce reliable brazed joints free of deleterious eutectic and stray-grains in single crystal superalloys. Keywords: brazingnickel alloysdiffusion brazingfinite element analysisinterface migration Acknowledgements Financial support from the NSERC of Canada is gratefully acknowledged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it