The role of corticotropin-releasing factor in pain and analgesia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) is a peptide that is released from the hypothalamus and in widespread areas of the brain following exposure to stressors. It is considered to be a mediator of many of the effects of stress, and its analgesic properties have been demonstrated in many studies. However, for primarily methodological reasons, the effects of CRF in the central nervous system have been neglected whereas the peripheral effects of CRF have been overemphasized. We present evidence that: (1) CRF can act at all levels of the neuraxis to produce analgesia; (2) the release of beta-endorphin does not explain the analgesia following intravenous or intracranial CRF administration; (3) inflammation must be present for local CRF to evoke analgesia and (4) the analgesic effects of CRF show specificity for prolonged pain. These findings suggest that CRF may have a significant role in chronic pain syndromes associated with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis abnormalities. Furthermore, CRF may represent a new class of analgesics that merits further study. Implications for the relationship between stress and pain are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".