MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028382726 · doi:10.1021/ic030024h

Ligand Close Packing and the Geometry of the Fluorides of the Nonmetals of Periods 3, 4, and 5

2003· article· en· W2028382726 on OpenAlex
E. A. Robinson, R. J. Gillespie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicInorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryLigand (biochemistry)Pauli exclusion principlePentagonal bipyramidal molecular geometryMoleculeOctahedronCoordination geometryCoordination numberCrystallographyOctahedral molecular geometryLone pairGeometryPeriod (music)Chemical physicsIonCrystal structurePhysicsCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the geometry of the fluorides of the nonmetals of periods 3, 4, and 5 in terms of the ligand close packing (LCP) model according to which molecular geometry is determined primarily by ligand-ligand repulsions (Pauli closed shell repulsions) rather than by the bonding and lone pair Pauli repulsions of the VSEPR model. The LCP model becomes the dominant factor in determing geometry when the ligands are sufficiently crowded that they may be regarded as essentially incompressible. Ligand close packing is a modification of the VSEPR model in which ligand-ligand repulsion (Pauli closed shell repulsion) is given more emphasis than bonding and nonbonding electron pair Pauli repulsion. The nonmetals of period 3 are large enough to form octahedral six coordinated molecules in which the ligands are close packed. The larger nonmetals of period 4 also have a maximum coordination number of six and an octahedral geometry although the ligands are not close packed. Ligand radii derived from the interligand distances in the molecules of period 3 depend only on the charge of the fluorine ligands and are consistent with the previously derived radii obtained from the fluorides of the close packed tetrahedral molecules of the period 2 elements. Although the ligands in the molecules of the period 4 nonmetals are not close packed, these elements are not large enough to form molecules with a higher coordination number. However, the larger period 5 nonmetals may have coordination numbers of seven and eight. The seven coordinated molecules have a pentagonal bipyramidal geometry in which the equatorial ligands are close packed. The eight coordinated molecules have a square antiprism geometry, which is not a close packed geometry although the fluorine interligand distances are only a little larger than expected for close packing. The difference between the axial and equatorial bond lengths in the trigonal bipyramidal pentafluorides and the pentagonal bipyramidal pentafluorides can be understood on the basis of ligand close packing. Ligand packing prevents the lone pair in AF(6)E molecules from fully entering the valence shell and thereby exerting its full stereochemical effect so that these molecules have a C(3)(v)() distorted octahedral geometry rather than a geometry based on pentagonal bipyramidal seven coordination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it