MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028400209 · doi:10.1159/000244397

Whole Body Lean Mass Is Altered by Dexamethasone Treatment through Reductions in Protein and Energy Utilization in Piglets

2009· article· en· W2028400209 on OpenAlexaff
Hope A. Weiler, Zheng Wang, Stephanie A. Atkinson

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of the Neonate · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDexamethasoneLean body massEndocrinologyInternal medicineCreatinineProtein catabolismPlaceboBlood urea nitrogenMedicineCatabolismProtein metabolismAnimal scienceBody weightChemistryBiologyMetabolismBiochemistryAmino acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to assess the effect of dexamethasone on growth, body composition and protein metabolism using the piglet as a model for rapidly growing premature infants. Seven-day-old male pigs (n = 18) were randomized to 0.5 mg/kg/day oral dexamethasone or placebo for 15 consecutive days. Weight and length gains and weight gained per energy or protein consumed were significantly lower in the dexamethasone group. Serum urea nitrogen was significantly higher in the dexamethasone group by day 15 of the study. No differences were observed between groups for urinary creatinine. The whole body percent lean mass was significantly lower and percent fat mass was significantly higher in the dexamethasone piglets, as measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. In young piglets, dexamethasone, at doses similar to those in premature infants, induces protein catabolism, impairs growth and alters its composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiology of the NeonateSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207