Association of biomass production and canopy spectral reflectance indices in winter wheat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased biomass production could be an important criterion for future grain yield improvement in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Quick assessment of genetic variations for biomass production may become a useful tool for wheat breeders. The potential of using canopy spectral reflectance indices (SRI) to assess genetic variation for biomass production in winter wheat was evaluated. Three experiments were conducted for 2 yr (2003-2004 and 2004-2005) at Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK. The first experiment consisted of 25 winter wheat cultivars, and the other two experiments contained two sets of 25 F4:6 and F4:7 recombinant inbred lines from two crosses developed by breeding programs in the great plains of the United States of America. Three groups of SRI (vegetation-based, pigment-based, and water-based) were tested for their ability to assess biomass production at three growth stages (booting, heading, and grainfilling). The water index and the normalized water indices gave stronger genetic correlations (P < 0.01) and linear relationship for biomass production compared with the vegetation-based and pigment-based indices. The strong association of water-based indices with biomass was related to the canopy water content of the genotypes. Canopy water content was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with biomass production. A strong positive association (P < 0.05) of grain yield and dry biomass was observed at the heading and grainfilling stages. Our study demonstrated the potential of using water-based SRI as a breeding tool to estimate genetic variability and identify genotypes with higher biomass production, and could eventually help to achieve higher grain yield in winter wheat. Key words: Wheat; biomass; grain yield; spectral reflectance index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".