Glutathione S-Transferase Variants in a Brazilian Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent pharmacogenomic studies have revealed significant interethnic differences in glutathione S-transferase (GST) allelic frequencies among various ethnic groups. Therefore, we have investigated GSTM1 (gene deletion), GSTT1 (gene deletion) and GSTP1 (rs1695) polymorphism frequencies in 3 Brazilian ethnic groups (n = 203). GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphism analyses were performed by multiplex polymerase chain reaction, and GSTP1 (rs1695) analysis was done by polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism. GSTM1- polymorphism frequency was 33.2%, while GSTT1 null (GSTT1-) was 30.2%. The valine GSTP1*B (rs1695) allele was present in 35.1% subjects, while the heterozygous form (isoleucine/valine) was the most prevalent genotype (46.6%). We found a statistically significant difference in genotype frequency among Amerindians versus Caucasians (p = 0.016) and among Amerindians versus African-Americans (p = 0.033). Considerable frequency variation was found in our study, even when compared with other studies showing phylogeographical heterogeneity to the genes studied in Brazilian populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".