MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028425617 · doi:10.1115/1.3120409

Inverse Calculation of Uniaxial Stress-Strain Curves From Bending Test Data

2009· article· en· W2028425617 on OpenAlexafffund
G. S. Schajer, Yuntao An

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFatigue and fracture mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTikhonov regularizationInverseInverse problemBendingSensitivity (control systems)Mathematical analysisRegularization (linguistics)MathematicsMaterials scienceGeometryComposite materialComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Uniaxial tension and compression stress-strain curves are simultaneously evaluated from load and surface strain data measured during a bending test. The required calculations for the uniaxial results are expressed as integral equations and solved in that form using inverse methods. This approach is taken to reduce the extreme numerical sensitivity of calculations based on equations expressed in differential form. The inverse solution method presented addresses the numerical sensitivity issue by using Tikhonov regularization. The use of a priori information is explored as a means of further stabilizing the stress-strain curve evaluation. The characteristics of the inverse solution are investigated using experimental data from bending and uniaxial tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering Materials and TechnologySame topicFatigue and fracture mechanicsFrench-language works237,207