L’eau douce, son exportation et le droit constitutionnel canadien*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ressource intrinsèquement fragile, l’eau douce s’avère un enjeu d’importance sur la scène mondiale. Dans cette dynamique, le Canada devient un acteur incontournable. Disposant de 9 p. 100 des ressources mondiales d’eau douce, il est, de facto, projeté au rang privilégié de grande puissance hydrique. Le Canada étant une fédération, tant les provinces que le gouvernement fédéral détiennent d’importants pouvoirs sur l’eau douce à la lumière du droit constitutionnel canadien. De plus, dans le contexte de l’Accord de libre-échange nord-américain (ALENA), la collaboration de ces deux ordres de gouvernement est essentielle pour protéger l’eau douce quant aux projets de dérivation ou d’exportation massive. L’avenir de cette ressource vitale devient donc une question partagée entre les gouvernements fédéral et provinciaux, qui sont en quelque sorte responsables conjointement de la pérennité de cette richesse à l’égard des générations futures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".