Glidescope Video Laryngoscope is Useful in Exchanging Endotracheal Tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To the Editor: A 34-year-old man (182 cm tall, 128 kg weight) was scheduled for excision of a vocal cord tumor. The patient had a Mallampati Class 2 airway with an interincisor distance of 5 cm and adequate neck extension. Following induction of anesthesia with fentanyl, propofol, and succinylcholine, we performed laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade and obtained a Cormack–Lehane Grade 3 view of the vocal cords. A small tracheal tube for laser surgery (internal diameter of 5.5 mm) was placed. Postoperatively, the patient's ventilation deteriorated with an increase in mean inspiratory pressure from 15 to 35 cm H2O and diffuse wheezing. We administered salbutamol and methylprednisolone and transferred the patient to the intensive care unit. There, the endotracheal tube was exchanged for a larger one under direct visual control with the GlideScope video laryngoscope (Saturn Biomedical System, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada). A few minutes later, we heard an air leak, and we noticed that the endotracheal tube pilot balloon was deflated. We exchanged the endotracheal tube by means of an airway exchange catheter, again using the Glidescope to guide us. On both occasions, we obtained a Cormack– Lehane Grade 1 view of the vocal cords. Replacing an endotracheal tube in a patient with compromised oxygenation is potentially dangerous. However, because the endotracheal tube exchange failed (1) and serious complications from using an airway exchange catheter (2) have been reported, we recommend the GlideScope for endotracheal tube exchanges. It has several features that are useful in managing difficult airways. First, an embedded antifogging mechanism prevents clouding of the image on the video display. Second, the 60° angle blade provides a minimally distorted view of the supraglottic anatomy. Third, the GlideScope's design is similar to that of a conventional laryngoscope, making it easy for conventional laryngoscope users to use. Finally, some studies have shown that the GlideScope improves the laryngoscopic view (3–5). In our patient, the GlideScope view was two Cormack–Lehane grades higher than that obtained with a Macintosh blade and a conventional laryngoscope. The GlideScope is useful for airway management, including endotracheal tube exchanges in the intensive care unit. David Peral, MD Elena Porcar, MD Jorge Bellver, MD José Higueras, MD Xavier Onrubia, MD Manuel Barberá, PhD Hospital Doctor Peset Valencia, Spain [email protected]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".