Water Resources and Precontact Site Placement in Southern Manitoba During the Last 2000 Years
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In common parlance, the basic necessities of life are water, food and shelter — assuming that air is a given. The inter-relationships of these three variables are complex and there is an obvious need that all are addressed by any society in their strategic land use planning. The spatial relationship of precontact Sonota/Besant, Blackduck/Duck Bay and Vickers focus sites in southern Manitoba is examined with relation to their proximity to water resources, as well as other factors that may playa role in site placement including seasonality, historical factors, environmental context, and culture-specific subsistence strategies. The observed site distribution of each group is compared with a random distribution of points. Results suggest that, while Sonota/Besant and Blackduck/Duck Bay sites are more frequently located near permanent water bodies and streams, Vickers focus sites tend to be located at some distance from permanent water and are more likely located near intermittent water sources. The reasons for these differences in site distribution with respect to water resources are believed to be related to historic subsistence strategies and, possibly, the desire to avoid unwanted visitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it