MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028465054 · doi:10.1063/1.1385560

The generic van der Waals equation of state and self-diffusion coefficients of liquids

2001· article· en· W2028465054 on OpenAlexaff
Kyunil Rah, Byung Chan Eu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forceThermodynamicsHard spheresSelf-diffusionEquation of stateChemistryDiffusionVan der Waals equationArgonVolume (thermodynamics)Monte Carlo methodTheorem of corresponding statesMethaneStatistical physicsVan der Waals radiusPhysicsMathematicsMoleculeStatisticsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we use the generic van der Waals equation of state to define the free volume of liquids along the liquid–vapor coexistence line (liquids curve) in the case of liquid argon and along three isotherms in the high-pressure regime in the case of liquid methane. With the free volume computed from the cavity function obtained by means of a Monte Carlo simulation method, we have calculated the self-diffusion coefficients of liquid argon and liquid methane. The Cohen–Turnbull free volume theory is used to calculate them. With the empirical parameter appearing in the Cohen–Turnbull theory suitably adjusted, the theoretical and experimental values of the self-diffusion coefficients agree very well with regard to the density and temperature dependence for the cases of available data compared. A pair of analytic formulas for density dependence of the self-diffusion coefficient is obtained by using the approximate cavity functions for hard spheres and tested against the experimental data on methane. A comparison of the analytic formulas with experiment is also very good.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207