MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028481528 · doi:10.2523/iptc-10321-ms

Failure Mechanisms in Deepwater Chalks: Rock Stability as Function of Pore Pressure and Water Saturation

2005· article· en· W2028481528 on OpenAlex
Carl Montgomery, Rico Ramos, Ivan Gil, Kjetil Ormark, Carsten Soerensen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
FundersConocoPhillips
KeywordsPore water pressureGeologySaturation (graph theory)Water saturationGeotechnical engineeringPetroleum engineeringPetrologyPorosity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper describes the mechanical behavior of unsupported open-holes (such as wellbores, perforations and cavities) in selected chalk samples from a European North Sea hydrocarbon reservoir. The main objective was to characterize cavity failure as a function of stress and fluid saturation. A series of compaction tests were performed on Thick-Wall Cylinders (TWC) of deeply buried North Sea Chalks, complemented with Uniaxial Compression Strength (UCS) tests. Comparison of oil vs. brine saturated specimens demonstrated water-induced "softening", drastic weakening, and then collapse of the cylindrical cavity. Images from X-Rays and thin-sections depict fracture-bands extending from the pilot-hole. These near-wellbore shear bands are interpreted to be pathways for enhanced permeability. The results and graphic images allow improved understanding of rock failure processes in chalks, as influenced by the varying degrees of water saturation and loading conditions. A poly-axial shear failure criterion is shown to predict TWC onset of instability. The knowledge gained on the failure mechanisms provides the exploitation engineer with scenarios on how flow-paths and well-inflows are affected by drawdown and water-floods. They also give diagnostics for declining productivity, which could lead to casing damage and wellbore failure. A field example is in wellbore acid fracturing, some of which lead to excessive liner deformations and even wellbore failures. Such downhole deformations are thought to be similar to those observed in these laboratory tests, mechanisms related to pore pressure depletion and/or stimulation. Acid-fracturing plans and models could be revised with the aid of processes, laboratory data, failure criteria, and results described here. Introduction Several oil fields in the North Sea have undergone periodic acid stimulation campaigns over the years. Typically, the results obtained after each acid fracturing treatment are excellent; several wells reported productivity index (PI) improvements ranging between 40 and 70. However, it has been commonly found that these results are short lived; the wells experience a severe decline in PI, and return to pretreatment production rates in as short as 1 year. Other problems have been observed in these fields; excessive casing deformation has been reported to occur in numerous wellbores. Previous field investigations have shown a correlation between casing deformation and perforation location. Casing failure was observed very near perforations subjected to acid-frac treatments. This suggests that large rock deformation, which causes casing failure, is a consequence of the acid stimulation process itself. The TWC laboratory program performed in this study provides some insight on the behavior of boreholes in chalks under stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it