MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028483806 · doi:10.1109/oecc.2009.5214255

Improved arrayed waveguide grating-based interrogation system for fiber bragg grating sensors

2009· article· en· W2028483806 on OpenAlexaff
Maria-Iulia Comanici, Lawrence R. Chen

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 14th OptoElectronics and Communications Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingMaterials sciencePHOSFOSSensitivity (control systems)OpticsFiber optic sensorContext (archaeology)Arrayed waveguide gratingOptoelectronicsGratingFiber laserWavelengthPower (physics)Optical fiberPolarization-maintaining optical fiberWavelength-division multiplexingElectronic engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose and demonstrate a fiber laser system that is used to improve the measurement sensitivity and power efficiency in the context of mapping the wavelength encoded information of an array of FBG strain sensors to a power measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2009 14th OptoElectronics and Communications ConferenceSame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207