Acute phase modulation of systemic insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding proteins after major burn injuries*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To provide a detailed, sequential analysis of insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding proteins in adults during the acute phase after a major burn injury. DESIGN: Descriptive, repeated measurements for quantitation and characterization of insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding proteins in adult burn survivors. SETTING: Burn center in a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 17 severely burned (>15% total body-surface area burned) adult patients. INTERVENTIONS: Venous blood was collected twice a day for 10 days and centrifuged, and the sera were stored at -80 degrees C until analysis. A series of 340 serum samples were analyzed by radioimmunoassay to determine the circulating concentration of insulin-like growth factor-1 and its major binding proteins (insulin-like growth factor-binding protein), by Western ligand blotting. To better understand the changes seen in systemic insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 levels by Western ligand blotting, a proteolysis assay was performed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Insulin-like growth factor-1 levels were reduced from day 0 and correlated with insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and -2 (p <.01), but not insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 and -4. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 was decreased relative to normal on day 0, declined further until day 3, and began recovering by day 6, but returned to only 35% of normal by day 10. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 and -2 were increased relative to normal and remained increased throughout the 10-day period. Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-4 concentrations, however, were similar to normal at day 1 but gradually increased over time. Burn serum incubated with recombinant human glycosylated iodine-125 insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 did not demonstrate any proteolysis, although proteolysis of nonglycosylated iodine-125 insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 reached levels of approximately 40%. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 proteolysis does not seem to be the mechanism by which systemic insulin-like growth factor-1 levels are reduced in major burn survivors. In vitro proteolysis of recombinant human glycosylated and nonglycosylated iodine-125 insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 does not reflect the in vivo situation in major burn survivors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".