MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gene-Environment Interactions in the Etiopathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2005· review· en· W2028531847 on OpenAlexaff
Devendra Amre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseMedicineInflammatory Bowel DiseasesBioinformaticsGeneticsBiologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is unknown. The last few years have seen a tremendous growth in efforts to identify causes, mechanisms and potential cure for the disease. Although few successes have been achieved, major elements in the intricate pathways leading to the disease remain unclear and deciphering them presents numerous challenges. A major hurdle (and interest) has been the observed widespread heterogeneity in the risk (and risk factors) for IBD among geographically diverse populations. Both environmental and genetic factors contribute to this heterogeneity. Much of the present focus has been on delineating the genetic susceptibility for IBD with limited emphasis on potential environmental risk factors. Previous studies exploring environmental risk factors have been inconsistent with the spectrum of risk going from low to high. This is especially true for the two most commonly studied risk factors: dietary elements and infection exposures. Although some of the inconsistency in findings across studies is likely due to differences in study designs, analytic methods and degree of biases, we have hypothesized that the heterogeneity is likely due to the presence of gene-environment interactions (G x E). On the basis of the latter, we have put forward two potential interaction pathways elucidating the mechanisms leading to IBD. The first pathway (1) describes interactions between dietary substrates (fats, vegetables and fruits) and xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (XME). XMEs are a family of enzymes that are commonly involved in the metabolism of both exogenous and endogenous substrates. They are broadly divided into two major classes: Phase 1 enzymes, such as the cytochrome P-450, metabolism by which on most occasions leads to the formation of toxic intermediates, and Phase 2 enzymes such as the gluthatione S-transferases, metabolism by which leads to detoxification and excretion of toxic intermediates. Genes coding these enzymes show variation resulting in individual differences both in the activity as well as the level of the enzymes. Our interaction pathway is based on the observations that a) many XMEs are expressed in the gastrointestinal tract; b) the encoding genes are located in chromosomal areas previously linked to IBD; and c) dietary fatty acids are common substrates for these enzymes and dietary fruits and vegetables modify their levels. Considering that genetic variants determine the ability of individuals to metabolize dietary substrates, it has been postulated that interactions between dietary substrates and DNA variants in the XME genes would modify risk for IBD, making some individuals at lower or higher risk. The second pathway (2) emphasizes the role of G x E between infections and genetic variants related to the cytokine and NOD2 genes. The role of infections in the etiopathogenesis of especially Crohn's disease (CD) has been controversial with some studies indicating protection, whereas others suggest elevated risks. These differences among populations are probably due to differential distribution of genetic factors. In this pathway we have hypothesized that potential interactions between DNA variants in cytokine and NOD2 genes and infectious exposures could modify risk for CD. Cyokines are known to modulate response to infections. Similarly, the NOD2 protein is thought to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of CD. Potential interactions between these elements could influence the development of T-cells and alter T-cell balance and predispose certain individuals to disease. IBD is a complex disease and the above described interaction pathways are unlikely to be all-encompassing. Nevertheless, they highlight the need for undertaking studies of potential G x E for theidentification of populations most susceptible to IBD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and NutritionSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207