MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028544104 · doi:10.1109/educon.2013.6530204

Classroom response systems in higher education: Meeting user needs with NetClick

2013· article· en· W2028544104 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInnovative Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPremiseVariety (cybernetics)Computer scienceContext (archaeology)Factor (programming language)MultimediaEngineering educationHuman–computer interactionEngineering managementEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Classroom response systems (CRS) have been shown to dramatically improve a variety of learning outcomes in science and engineering education. Their adoption in research university classrooms has been very slow. This paper postulates a contributing factor to the lack of widespread adoption of CRS in that context and introduces a new CRS designed to mitigate the identified factor. The CRS, NetClick, is built on the premise that the requirement of authoring new content prevents many Professors from using existing CRS. After describing the operation and advantages of NetClick to other CRS, we describe initial feedback from Computer Science Professors on its use for converting existing teaching slides into interactive content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.718
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207