Lumbar motoneuron fate in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Onuf's nucleus, a collection of motoneurons within the spinal cord, is often spared in the neurodegenerative disorder amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. To assess whether these cells survive in a rodent model of this disease, motoneurons were counted in the spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus (an homologous structure to Onuf's), as well as in two other cell groups at the same level of the spinal cord, the dorsolateral nucleus and the retrodorsolateral nucleus. In mice displaying signs of neurodegeneration, both the dorsolateral and retrodorsolateral nuclei displayed significant motoneuron loss compared to controls; this cell loss was particularly exaggerated in the retrodorsolateral nucleus of animals displaying a rapid disease progression. However, no significant decline in motoneuron number was observed in the spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus, and the perineal muscle bulbocavernosus, which is innervated by this nucleus, appeared to be unaffected. This was in stark contrast to the thigh muscles, which displayed significant atrophy. Overall, these data indicate that the spinal nucleus of the bulbocavernosus is spared from degeneration in an animal model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, paralleling observations in patients suffering from this disease. Further study of this resistance to motoneuron loss may provide useful insights into the pathophysiology of the degenerative process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".