MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028565501 · doi:10.7202/1015731ar

« Procurer à mes lecteurs quelques heures de délassement » : Les Mélanges, les Notes de voyage et le roman Pour la patrie de Jules-Paul Tardivel

2013· article· fr· W2028565501 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dominique Marquis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Historical Association · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jules-Paul Tardivel a été propriétaire et rédacteur principal du journal La Vérité de 1881 à 1905, date de son décès. Ardent défenseur des principes ultramontains, il utilise son journal comme une arme de combat contre toutes les idées qui s’éloignent de l’orthodoxie catholique et qu’il juge trop libérales. Tardivel n’a cependant pas uniquement publié son journal : on compte aussi plusieurs livres et brochures à son actif. Les idées véhiculées par Tardivel dans La Vérité ont été abondamment analysées, mais l’historiographie est demeurée plus discrète sur ses autres publications. Cet article s’intéresse à quelques-uns de ces livres, plus particulièrement aux Mélanges, aux Notes de voyage et au roman Pour la patrie. Grâce à une analyse croisée des livres, du journal et de la correspondance de Tardivel, nous découvrirons quelles ont été les stratégies déployées par le journaliste et son réseau pour assurer la diffusion de ces oeuvres qui ont participé au même combat que le journal. Si ces publications n’ont pas connu le succès souhaité, elles s’ajoutent néanmoins à l’arsenal varié de publications ultramontaines recensées durant la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.010
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Historical AssociationSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207