MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028617210 · doi:10.1021/bm800320z

Application of Molecular Dynamics Simulation To Predict the Compatability between Water-Insoluble Drugs and Self-Associating Poly(ethylene oxide)-<i>b</i>-poly(ε-caprolactone) Block Copolymers

2008· article· en· W2028617210 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystallization and Solubility Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSolubilityMolecular dynamicsCopolymerEthylene oxideMicelleChemistryFlory–Huggins solution theoryMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryChemical engineeringAqueous solutionOrganic chemistryComputational chemistryPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present work, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was applied to study the solubility of two water-insoluble drugs, fenofibrate and nimodipine, in a series of micelle-forming PEO-b-PCL block copolymers with combinations of blocks having different molecular weights. The solubility predictions based on the MD results were then compared with those obtained from solubility experiments and by the commonly used group contribution method (GCM). The results showed that Flory-Huggins interaction parameters computed by the MD simulations are consistent with the solubility data of the drug/PEO-b-PCL systems, whereas those calculated by the GCM significantly deviate from the experimental observation. We have also accounted for the possibility of drug solubilization in the PEO block of PEO-b-PCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.718

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it