Mixing with multiple circular turbulent jets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a laboratory study investigating chemical mixing in an open channel with multiple circular turbulent jets. The experiments were carried out for a, which is the ratio of the velocity of the jets to that of the crossflow, varying from 8 to 16, with a combination of coflowing and crossflowing jets and only crossflowing jets. The number of ports for the jets was varied for 20 to 36 and the spacing between the ports was varied from 12d to 24d where d is the diameter of the ports. Concentration measurements covered the relative distance x/d=2000, where x is the longitudinal distance from the diffuser. The dimensionless mixing distance cum/d at which the standard deviation of the concentration field reached a value of 5% was equal to 25000 where xm is the mixing distance. The results indicate that a diffuser with turbulent crossflowing jets could be an alternative to mechanical methods for achieving mixing of chemicals in open channels in water treatment plants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it