MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2028624962 · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/26

ERRATUM: “THE EIGHTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY: FIRST DATA FROM SDSS-III” (2011, ApJS, 193, 29)

2011· erratum· en· W2028624962 on OpenAlexaff
H. Aihara, Carlos Allende Prieto, Deokkeun An, Scott F. Anderson, É. Aubourg, E. Balbinot, Timothy C. Beers, Andreas A. Berlind, Steven J. Bickerton, Dmitry Bizyaev, Michael R. Blanton, John J. Bochanski, A. Bolton, Jo Bovy, W. N. Brandt, J. Brinkmann, Peter J. Brown, Joel R. Brownstein, Nicolás G. Busca, H. Campbell, Michael A. Carr, Yanmei Chen, C. Chiappini, Johan Comparat, N. Connolly, Marina Cortês, Rupert A. C. Croft, Antonio J. Cuesta, L. N. da Costa, James R. A. Davenport, Kyle Dawson, Saurav Dhital, Anne Ealet, G. Ebelke, Edward M. Edmondson, Daniel J. Eisenstein, S. Escoffier, M. Esposito, Michael L. Evans, Xiaohui Fan, Bruno Femenía Castellá, Andreu Font-Ribera, Peter M. Frinchaboy, Jian Ge, Bruce Gillespie, G. Gilmore, J. I. Gónzalez Hernández, J. Richard Gott, Andrew Gould, E. K. Grebel, James E. Gunn, J.–Ch. Hamilton, Paul Harding, D. E. Harris, Suzanne L. Hawley, Frederick R. Hearty, Shirley Ho, David W. Hogg, Jon A. Holtzman, Klaus Honscheid, Naohisa Inada, Inese I. Ivans, Linhua Jiang, Jennifer A. Johnson, C. Jordan, Wendell P. Jordan, Eyal Kazin, D. Kirkby, Mark A. Klaene, G. R. Knapp, Jean‐Paul Kneib, C. S. Kochanek, Lars Koesterke, Juna A. Kollmeier, Richard G. Kron, Hubert Lampeitl, Dustin Lang, Jean-Marc Le Goff, Young Sun Lee, Yen‐Ting Lin, Daniel C. Long, Craig Loomis, S. Lucatello, Britt Lundgren, Robert H. Lupton, Zhibo Ma, Nicholas MacDonald, Suvrath Mahadevan, Marcio A. G. Maia, Martin Makler, Elena Malanushenko, Viktor Malanushenko, Rachel Mandelbaum, Claudia Maraston, Daniel Margala, Karen L. Masters, Cameron K. McBride, P. McGehee, I. D. McGreer, Brice Ménard, Jordi Miralda‐Escudé, Heather Morrison, Susan E. Mullally, Demitri Muna, Jeffrey A. Munn, Hitoshi Murayama, Adam D. Myers, Tracy Naugle, Angelo Fausti Neto, Duy Cuong Nguyen, Robert C. Nichol, R. W. O’Connell, R. L. C. Ogando, Matthew D. Olmstead, Daniel Oravetz, Nikhil Padmanabhan, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Kaike Pan, Parul Pandey, Isabelle Pâris, Will J. Percival, Patrick Petitjean, Robert Pfaffenberger, J. Pforr, S. Phleps, Christophe Pichon, Matthew M. Pieri, Francisco Prada, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, M. Jordan Raddick, Beatriz Ramos, C. Reylé, G. T. Richards, Hans‐Walter Rix, A. C. Robin, H. J. Rocha–Pinto, Constance M. Rockosi, Natalie A. Roe, Emmanuel Rollinde, Ashley J. Ross, Nicholas P. Ross, Bruno M. Rossetto, Ariel G. Sánchez, Conor Sayres, David J. Schlegel, Katharine J. Schlesinger, Sarah J. Schmidt, Donald P. Schneider, E. S. Sheldon, Yiping Shu, Jennifer Simmerer, Audrey Simmons, T. Sivarani, Stephanie A. Snedden, Jennifer Sobeck, Matthias Steinmetz, Michael A. Strauss, Alexander S. Szalay, Masayuki Tanaka, Aniruddha R. Thakar, D. Thomas, Jeremy L. Tinker, B. M. Tofflemire, Rita Tojeiro, Christy Tremonti, Jan Vandenberg, M. Vargas-Magaña, Licia Verde, Nicole P. Vogt, David A. Wake, Ji Wang, B. A. Weaver, David H. Weinberg, Martin White, Simon D. M. White, B. Yanny, Naoki Yasuda, Christophe Yèche, Idit Zehavi

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2011
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsSkyComputer scienceAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Corrects an error in Aihara, H., et al. (2011). The eighth data release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: first data from SDSS-III. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 193(2), article no. 29. For the original article, see: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/224999

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.356

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.099

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement SeriesSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207